Graziano & Raulin
Research Methods (9th edition)
Chapter 8 Suggested Readings
Hypothesis Testing, Validity,
and Threats to Validity
Listed below are resources that will help you to further explore the material covered in this chapter.
Barber, T. X., & Silver, M. J. (1968). Fact, fiction and the experimenter bias effect. Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement, 70, 1–29. (8)
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally. (8)
Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260. (8)
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field studies. Chicago: Rand McNally. (8)
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women’s math performance. Science, 314, 435. (8)
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383. (8)
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L., Roberts, S. A., & Rock, D. (2004). Longitudinal Prediction of Schizophrenia in a Prospective High-Risk Study. In L. F. DiLalla (Ed.), Behavior genetics principles: Perspectives in development, personality, and psychopathology: Decade of behavior (pp. 135–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (8)
Graziano, A. M. (1974). Child without tomorrow. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press. (8)
Graziano, A. M. (2002). Developmental disabilities: Introduction to a diverse field. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (8)
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers. (8)
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61–66. (8)
McGrath, P. (2006). Psychosocial issues in childhood autism rehabilitation: A review. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 11, 29-36. (8)
Meredith, R. (1996). Man is guilty of murder in death after bridge dispute. New York Times, April 30, Sect. A, p. 16. (8)
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. (8)
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783. (8)
Pierce, K., & Schriebman, L. (1997). Multiple peer use of pivotal response training social behaviors of classmates with autism: Results from trained and untrained peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 157–160. (8)
Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience, and what makes us human. New York: HarperCollins. (8)
Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K. L. (1963a). The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Behavioral Science, 8, 183–189. (8)
Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K. L. (1963b). Three experiments in experimenter bias. Psychological Reports, 12, 491–511. (8)
Suomi, S. J. (2008). How mother nurture helps mother nature: Scientific evidence for the protective effects of good nurturing on genetic propensity toward anxiety and alcohol abuse. In K. K. Klein (Ed.), Authoritative communities: The scientific case for nurturing the whole child (pp. 87-102). New York: Springer. (8)